Just How Serious Is IRS Asserting FBAR Penalties?

The IRS has authority to assert FBAR civil penalties.  Before delving into the FBAR abyss, this is a good time to debunk some FBAR myths.  First, there is no such thing as an FBAR penalty within the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”).  The FBAR penalty exists only outside of the OVDI framework.  However, there is a penalty within OVDI that is often considered to be the equivalent of the FBAR penalty.  That penalty is commonly referred to as the offshore penalty.  Generally, it is 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance of all foreign accounts during the disclosure period but lower rates are available.

Where a taxpayer does not come forward into OVDI and has now been targeted by IRS for failing to file FBAR’s, the IRS may now assert FBAR penalties that could be either non-willful or willful.  Both types have varying upper limits, but no floor.  The first type is the non-willful FBAR penalty.  The maximum non-willful FBAR penalty is $ 10,000.  The second type is the willful FBAR penalty.  The maximum willful FBAR penalty is the greater of (a) $ 100,000 or (b) 50% of the total balance of the foreign account.  In addition the IRS can pursue criminal charges with the willful FBAR penalty.

For the non-willful penalty, all the IRS has to show is that an FBAR was not filed.  Whether the taxpayer knew or did not know about the filing of this form is irrelevant.  The non-willful FBAR penalty is $10,000.00 per account, per year and so a taxpayer with multiple accounts over multiple years can end up with a huge penalty.

But if the IRS attempts to assert a willful FBAR penalty, the IRS has the burden of proving willfulness.  Willfulness has been defined by courts as “an intentional violation of a known legal duty.”

While the standard for proving willfulness in the context of a criminal tax case is relatively clear, just the opposite is true in the context of asserting a civil FBAR penalty.  For FBAR violations the standard is that a person had knowledge that he has a reporting requirement.  And if a person has that requisite knowledge, the only intent needed to constitute a willful violation of the requirement is a conscious choice not to file the FBAR.  The latter is referred to in legal circles as the theory of “willful blindness”.

4th Circuit Court Established Low Standard For Proving Willfulness

In one fell swoop, the 4th Circuit Court Of Appeals, which is one of eleven in the United States and ranks right below the United States Supreme Court, lowered the burden of proof needed by IRS to show that the failure to file an FBAR was intentional.

The 4th Circuit ruled that a taxpayer’s signature on his tax return was “prima facie evidence that he knew the contents of the return” and that the instructions in Schedule B, which refers to whether the taxpayer has any foreign accounts put U.S. taxpayers on “inquiry notice” of the FBAR filing requirement. It does not matter that the taxpayer never read his tax return or looked at the FBAR form.  The Court went on to say that this was enough to demonstrate a “conscious effort to avoiding learning about reporting requirements… meant to conceal or mislead sources of income or other financial information… that constitutes willful blindness to the FBAR requirements”. U.S. v. J. Bryan Williams, No. 10-2230, July 20, 2012 (unpublished).

In other words, the instructions in Schedule B for Form 1040, which refers to the FBAR, puts every taxpayer on “inquiry notice” of the filing requirement and so a taxpayer by simply signing his tax return or authorizing the filing of his tax return is presumed to be cognizant of the FBAR requirement.

The practical effect of this opinion is nothing short of mind blowing.  First, instead of having to prove a specific intent to “violate a known legal duty” which other tax cases have upheld as the standard for willfulness, the opinion suggests that a taxpayer’s presumed understanding of the FBAR requirement may be enough to make him liable for penalties for willful violations.  In other words, whether a person actually knew about the FBAR reporting requirements is meaningless.

Second, it gives a major boost to the IRS’s current intensive pursuit of overseas tax evasion by making it easier for the IRS to prove willfulness in the context of a willful FBAR penalty.  Very simply, the IRS now has enormous leverage to collect the hefty penalties that accompany the willful FBAR penalty.  Indeed, the civil penalty for willfully failing to file an FBAR may reach $100,000, or 50% of the value of the offshore account, whichever is greater.  This result is likely to be the start of a wave of FBAR audits for the IRS because of the sheer sums the IRS stands to collect by ramping up civil FBAR enforcement.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”)

This program was first created in 2009 as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) but in 2011 was renamed to OVDI.  Generally, the miscellaneous offshore penalty under the OVDI program (the “OVDI penalty”) equals 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in the foreign assets or entities during the years covered by the OVDI program, but may be reduced in limited cases to 12.5% or 5%.  Certain taxpayers may qualify for even greater savings through a reduction of the offshore penalty.

Taxpayers participating in the ongoing 2012 OVDI generally agree to file amended returns and file FBARs for eight tax years, and in addition to paying pay the OVDI penalty (which is assessed in lieu of all other potentially applicable penalties associated with a foreign financial account or entity) taxpayers would pay the appropriate taxes and interest together with an accuracy related penalty equivalent to 20% of any income tax deficiency

Taxpayers whose highest aggregate foreign account balance is less than $75,000 for each of the years in the OVDI disclosure period may qualify for a reduced 12.5% OVDI penalty.

Taxpayers who fall into one of three specific categories may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  The first category includes taxpayers who inherited the undisclosed foreign accounts or assets.  Second, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware that they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  Finally, U.S. taxpayers who are foreign residents may also qualify for the reduced 5% OVDI penalty in certain circumstances.

What Should You Do?

Don’t wait for the IRS to find you.  If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

IRS To Announce New Initiative For U.S. Expats Not Willfully Evading Taxes.

With more than six million U.S. citizens living abroad, the IRS is looking to expand its net to bring in those U.S. Expats who are noncompliant with their tax obligations but are not willfully evading taxes may to come into compliance.  On June 3, 2014, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, John A. Koskinen, spoke at the U.S. Council For International Business-OECD International Tax Conference in Washington, D.C.

In his speech the Commissioner acknowledged that the 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”) and its predecessors (the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) and the 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative) have resulted in many U.S. taxpayers coming into compliance and that the IRS is currently considering making further program modifications to accomplish even more.  Unlike the two previous programs which had set terms and a definite expiration date, the current 2012 OVDI program’s terms are subject to change by the IRS and at any time the IRS may even terminate this program.

While the current attitude of the IRS is to keep the doors open and allow as many taxpayers as possible to come forward, the IRS is mindful of the balance between those taxpayers willfully evading their tax obligations and those taxpayers who lack willfulness.  The IRS is also aware that adjustments in OVDI may be necessary to accommodate those U.S. citizens who have resided abroad for many years, perhaps even the vast majority of their lives, and that those taxpayers should be treated differently than U.S. resident taxpayers who were willfully hiding their investments overseas.

The Commissioner said that the new changes to OVDI should be announced soon.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”)

This program was first created in 2009 as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) but in 2011 was renamed to OVDI.  Generally, the miscellaneous offshore penalty under the OVDI program (the “OVDI penalty”) equals 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in the foreign assets or entities during the years covered by the OVDI program, but may be reduced in limited cases to 12.5% or 5%.  Certain taxpayers may qualify for even greater savings through a reduction of the offshore penalty.

Taxpayers participating in the ongoing 2012 OVDI generally agree to file amended returns and file FBARs for eight tax years, and in addition to paying pay the OVDI penalty (which is assessed in lieu of all other potentially applicable penalties associated with a foreign financial account or entity) taxpayers would pay the appropriate taxes and interest together with an accuracy related penalty equivalent to 20% of any income tax deficiency

Taxpayers whose highest aggregate foreign account balance is less than $75,000 for each of the years in the OVDI disclosure period may qualify for a reduced 12.5% OVDI penalty.

Taxpayers who fall into one of three specific categories may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  The first category includes taxpayers who inherited the undisclosed foreign accounts or assets.  Second, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware that they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  Finally, U.S. taxpayers who are foreign residents may also qualify for the reduced 5% OVDI penalty in certain circumstances.

What Should You Do?

If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). If the IRS announces adjustments to this program that are more favorable to U.S. Expats those benefits should apply to current OVDI applicants.  Likewise, if the IRS were to tighten the terms of OVDI and increase the penalty, anyone registered in OVDI before such a change should still be under the pre-existing terms.   But once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

Don’t Miss The FBAR June 30, 2014 Filing Deadline

Despite the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) publishing final regulations for reporting bank accounts, securities accounts and other financial accounts located in a foreign country many taxpayers remain confused regarding the filing requirements, including the fast-approaching and accelerated filing deadline.

Historically, the disclosure of foreign bank accounts was done by filing Form TD 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) with the U.S. Department Of Treasury. Any person who has a financial interest in, or signature authority over, a foreign financial account (the “foreign accounts”), including a bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account, is required under the Bank Secrecy Act to report the foreign account to the U.S. Department Of Treasury by filing the FBAR by June 30th of the following calendar year. Unlike income tax filings an extension of time to file FBAR after the June 30th due date is not available.

While the requirements and deadline for disclosing foreign bank accounts have not changed, the reporting form and manner of filing has. Now disclosure is made by e-filing FinCEN Form 114. 

The Purpose of The FBAR Form

The FBAR form is a tool used by the United States government to identify persons who may be utilizing foreign financial accounts to circumvent United States tax laws. Revenue Agents or investigators use the FBAR to help identify or trace funds used for illicit purposes, including counter-terrorism, or to identify unreported income maintained and/or generated abroad.

Who Must File

Any U.S. person, with few exceptions, with a financial interest in, or signature authority or other authority over, any foreign financial account(s) in a foreign country and the aggregated value of these account(s) exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year must file and FBAR. Foreign financial account(s) include, but are not limited to, a checking/savings bank account, brokerage account, mutual fund, trust, or other type of foreign financial account. A U.S. person includes a U.S. citizen, a foreign national who is a U.S. tax resident and a U.S. entity, e.g., a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company (“LLC”) or a trust that is created, organized or formed under the laws of the U.S., any State, the District of Columbia, the Territories, the Insular Possessions of the U.S. or the Indian Tribes.

What Needs to Be Reported

If a filing requirement exists, personal information, such as name, address and Social Security number, along with the following, must be reported:

  • Maximum value of the account during the calendar year;

  • Type of account (i.e., bank, securities, foreign mutual funds, foreign-issued life insurance/annuity contract with cash value, etc.);

  • Name of financial institution in which account is held;

  • Account number; and

  • Mailing address of financial institution.

The IRS defines maximum account value as the largest amount of currency and/or monetary instruments that appear on any quarterly or more frequently issued account statement during the tax year.

Failure to File

While the FBAR is an information return that imposes no tax, significant civil and criminal penalties may be asserted for failure to file. The civil penalty for willful failure to file an FBAR equals the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the total balance of the foreign account per violation.  The government may also pursue criminal prosecution which can result in up to five years of jail time. Non-willful violations that are not due to reasonable cause incur a penalty of $10,000 per violation.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”)

This program was first created in 2009 as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) but in 2011 was renamed to OVDI. Generally, the miscellaneous offshore penalty under the OVDI program (the “OVDI penalty”) equals 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in the foreign assets or entities during the years covered by the OVDI program, but may be reduced in limited cases to 12.5% or 5%. Certain taxpayers may qualify for even greater savings through a reduction of the offshore penalty. 

Taxpayers participating in the ongoing 2012 OVDI generally agree to file amended returns and file FBARs for eight tax years, and in addition to paying pay the OVDI penalty (which is assessed in lieu of all other potentially applicable penalties associated with a foreign financial account or entity) taxpayers would pay the appropriate taxes and interest together with an accuracy related penalty equivalent to 20% of any income tax deficiency

Taxpayers whose highest aggregate foreign account balance is less than $75,000 for each of the years in the OVDI disclosure period may qualify for a reduced 12.5% OVDI penalty.

Taxpayers who fall into one of three specific categories may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  The first category includes taxpayers who inherited the undisclosed foreign accounts or assets.  Second, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware that they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  Finally, U.S. taxpayers who are foreign residents may also qualify for the reduced 5% OVDI penalty in certain circumstances. 

What Should You Do?

Don’t let another deadline slip by. If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

OVDI – Are You In Or Out?

A taxpayer who has not disclosed foreign bank accounts to the IRS can be charged with substantial miscellaneous Title 26 offshore penalties that ultimately can wipe out a taxpayer’s foreign assets.  Disclosure is made by e-filing FinCEN Form 1114 (formerly Form TD F 90-22.1), Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”).  The civil penalty for willful failure to file an FBAR equals the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the total balance of the foreign account per violation.  The government may also pursue criminal prosecution which can result in up to fice years of jail time. Non-willful violations that are not due to reasonable cause incur a penalty of $10,000 per violation.

The IRS has established a program called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”) whereby taxpayers can avoid criminal prospection and the penalties are reduced.

With the deadline of June 30th approaching for the filing of a 2013 FBAR and the full implementation of FATCA starting July 1st, a taxpayer who is non-compliant with the reporting of foreign accounts and foreign income has an important decision to make. OVDI – Are You In Or Out?

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”)

This program was first created in 2009 as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) but in 2011 was renamed to OVDI. Generally, the miscellaneous offshore penalty under the OVDI program (the “OVDI penalty”) equals 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in the foreign assets or entities during the years covered by the OVDI program, but may be reduced in limited cases to 12.5% or 5%. Certain taxpayers may qualify for even greater savings through a reduction of the offshore penalty. 

Taxpayers participating in the ongoing 2012 OVDI generally agree to file amended returns and file FBARs for eight tax years, and in addition to paying pay the OVDI penalty (which is assessed in lieu of all other potentially applicable penalties associated with a foreign financial account or entity) taxpayers would pay the appropriate taxes and interest together with an accuracy related penalty equivalent to 20% of any income tax deficiency

Taxpayers whose highest aggregate foreign account balance is less than $75,000 for each of the years in the OVDI disclosure period may qualify for a reduced 12.5% OVDI penalty.

Taxpayers who fall into one of three specific categories may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  The first category includes taxpayers who inherited the undisclosed foreign accounts or assets.  Second, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware that they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  Finally, U.S. taxpayers who are foreign residents may also qualify for the reduced 5% OVDI penalty in certain circumstances. 

What Should You Do?

Don’t let another deadline slip by. If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

OVDI Myths

U.S. taxpayers with previously undisclosed interests in foreign financial accounts and assets continue to analyze and seek advice regarding the most appropriate methods of coming into compliance with their U.S. filing and reporting obligations. Many are pursuing participation in the current IRS Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative known as OVDI (the current version began in 2012 and is modeled after similar programs in 2009 and 2011 which initially were called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program or OVDP). But what all the confusion and misinformation out there – what should you do? In this blog I attempt to clear some misconceptions.

Myth #1: An individual will be better off “explaining” the undisclosed foreign bank accounts through amended tax returns, rather than opting into OVDI.

Even outside of OVDI, any disclosure to the IRS requires that the taxpayer file amended tax returns and be prepared to provide the foreign bank information and statements to support the new income being reported. Such returns are signed by the taxpayer that they are true and complete. Being outside of OVDI the government can develop a case supporting severe penalties and even criminal prosecution using the combination of original filed tax returns which omitted the foreign income and amended tax returns reporting the foreign income as admissions of intent to evade U.S. income tax.  

Myth #2: Once an individual enters into OVDI, you cannot dispute the amount of penalties imposed by the program.

Just because the penalty rate structure is set in OVDI does not mean the amount of penalty can never be disputed. Agents assigned to OVDI cases do make mistakes and do misinterpret foreign bank income and transaction activity including those accounts, assets and transactions that should not be part of any penalty calculation. These disputes or differences can still be contested and challenged through different means and channels while still remaining in OVDI.

Myth #3: An individual who enters into OVDI opens up all years for examination since becoming a U.S. person for tax purposes with undisclosed foreign bank accounts and unreported foreign income.

While the normal Statute Of Limitations to examine a tax return is three years, it can be extended to six years where there is a substantial omission of income and where the government can show fraud, the government has no limitation on how far back it can go. Furthermore, the government has a six-year Statute Of Limitations to pursue criminal prosecution. A person who is in OVDI avoids criminal exposure and any income tax return amendments are limited to the last eight years or if shorter, from the time the individual becomes a U.S. person for tax purposes.

Myth #4: An individual who enters in OVDI is forfeiting assets, including entire lifetime savings and more to the government so that any income, inheritances, or gifts these people may receive in the future will belong to the IRS. 

Outside of OVDI, the MINIMUM penalty is 50% of the value of your foreign assets. But for taxpayers participating in OVDI, the MAXIMUM penalty is 27.5%. That means for taxpayers who are in OVDI, they will still get to keep at least 72.5% of their foreign assets.   

Myth #5: Once the IRS learns of an individual entering into OVDI, the IRS will remove or prevent the individual from the program and the IRS will prosecute that person using the very information provided by the taxpayer as part of the OVDI process.    

To encourage taxpayers to come forward into OVDI, the government will respect the transactional or use immunity it offers to taxpayers participating in the program.  At this time the government would prefer cases to be dispensed in OVDI even though the government gives up criminal prosecution and takes a “hair-cut” on the penalties that can be imposed.  

Myth #6: The IRS Criminal Investigation Division (“CID”) in evaluating your OVDI application will characterize your offshore transactions to involve the crimes of money laundering, wire fraud, mail fraud or tax evasion to prevent you from qualifying for the program.

Unless you are involved in drug trafficking, weapons trafficking or some other illegal activity that another government agency would have you on a watch list, the government would rather see a taxpayer come forward in OVDI and as a result for those that do the government will not pursue criminal prosecution and will apply the reduced penalties outlined in the OVDI structure.  

Myth #7: Since there is no public follow-through by the IRS of its threats to individuals who have not entered the OVDI, it is a safe bet to avoid OVDI and instead pursue a Quiet Disclosure.

Whenever a taxpayer files an original or amended income tax return, the government will have at least three years from the due date of the return or date the return was filed (whichever is later) to examine that return. This is still the case even if the return that was filed showed an overpayment that was refunded to you. But with OVDI, you do not have this cloud of uncertainty hanging over you. At the conclusion of your OVDI case, the government will issue a closing agreement that when signed off by the taxpayer closes the case.

Myth #8: Those taxpayers outside of OVDI are assessed far less in taxes and penalties than individuals who have elected to make a disclosure through OVDI.

With the government encouraging taxpayers to come forward in OVDI, why would the government undermine the integrity of the program by offering a better deal to people who do not come forward and look to avoid detection by the IRS? If a taxpayer did not disclose his foreign bank accounts AND did not report foreign income, you will fare worse than entering into OVDI and end up loosing the entire value of your foreign accounts.

Myth #9: By entering into OVDI, you fully waive all constitutional rights.

Some people have stated that participants entering into the OVDP must waive Constitutional Protections against: self-incrimination (5th amendment), unreasonable search and seizure (4th amendment), and excessive fines (8th amendment).  What they fail to recognize is that the same constitutional protections apply to OVDI participants as to people who file original or amended income tax returns with the IRS.

Myth #10: The IRS favors a Qualified Quiet Disclosure over a Quiet Disclosure.

Some people have stated that a “Qualified Quiet Disclosure” is different from a “quiet disclosure” for which the latter the IRS has promised a detection and punishment campaign.  Truth is that unless you enter into OVDI, any other form of disclosure is a “Quiet Disclosure” that can subject you to the full wrath of the IRS and with the IRS then looking to impose the maximum in penalties you can likely end up loosing all of your foreign account funds and perhaps be subject to criminal prosecution.

If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

Avoiding OVDI – Pitfalls Of Other Forms Of Disclosures

A taxpayer who has not disclosed foreign bank accounts to the IRS and to cure this delinquency and avoid criminal repercussions applies to the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”), generally must pay a miscellaneous Title 26 offshore penalty, in lieu of traditional penalties that would apply to foreign assets or entities outside of OVDI.  The most significant penalty that the offshore penalty replaces is the penalty for failure to file a Form TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”).  The civil penalty for willful failure to file an FBAR equals the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the total balance of the foreign account per violation.  Non-willful violations that are not due to reasonable cause incur a penalty of $10,000 per violation.

Individuals with previously undisclosed foreign assets and/or income have come to understand the need to be come compliant with the IRS and with all the confusion out there on how best to become compliant. The avenues to be compliant that are most widely discussed are (1) the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”), (2) making a Quiet Disclosure, or (3) making a Present Tax Year Only Disclosure.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”)

This program was first created in 2009 as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) but in 2011 was renamed to OVDI. Generally, the miscellaneous offshore penalty under the OVDI program (the “OVDI penalty”) equals 27.5% of the highest aggregate balance in the foreign assets or entities during the years covered by the OVDI program, but may be reduced in limited cases to 12.5% or 5%. Certain taxpayers may qualify for even greater savings through a reduction of the offshore penalty. 

Taxpayers participating in the ongoing 2012 OVDI generally agree to file amended returns and file FBARs for eight tax years, and in addition to paying pay the OVDI penalty (which is assessed in lieu of all other potentially applicable penalties associated with a foreign financial account or entity) taxpayers would pay the appropriate taxes and interest together with an accuracy related penalty equivalent to 20% of any income tax deficiency

Taxpayers whose highest aggregate foreign account balance is less than $75,000 for each of the years in the OVDI disclosure period may qualify for a reduced 12.5% OVDI penalty.

Taxpayers who fall into one of three specific categories may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  The first category includes taxpayers who inherited the undisclosed foreign accounts or assets.  Second, taxpayers who are foreign residents and who were unaware that they were U.S. citizens may qualify for a reduced 5% OVDI penalty.  Finally, U.S. taxpayers who are foreign residents may also qualify for the reduced 5% OVDI penalty in certain circumstances. 

Making A Quiet Disclosure

While promoted under different names such as “Explained Disclosure”, “Qualified Quiet Disclosure” or “Silent Disclosure”, they all mean the same as Quiet Disclosure.

There are strong indications that going forward, the IRS will be cracking down more stringently on the practice of “quiet disclosures”.  Under a quiet disclosure, a taxpayer through normal IRS filing channels files new or amends past tax returns and FBAR’s to report previously unreported offshore accounts and foreign income in an attempt to avoid potential civil penalties and fines.

The danger in doing this, however, is that if the IRS discovers a quiet disclosure, the taxpayer will be exposed to higher civil penalties than he would have if he voluntarily came forward under OVDI.  Where a taxpayer has been discovered by IRS in this process, that taxpayer who made the quiet disclosure will not be eligible for the 27.5% OVDI penalty.  Instead the traditional penalties of 50% would apply.  Also, if appropriate, the IRS may recommend criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice. 

The IRS does encourage those who have already quietly disclosed to come forward under the OVDI to avail themselves of the lower penalty rates and avoid potential harsher consequences but you must act quickly because OVDI is not available to you if the IRS has already selected you as a target.

Making A Present Tax Year Only Disclosure

Some tax advisors are recommending that taxpayers merely get into compliance on a go forward basis and do nothing to address the past non-compliance gambling that the IRS does not have the resources to detect the foreign account. I call this “Present Tax Year Only Disclosure”. This could be the worst advice ever.  In my opinion this option is also not viable because of the ease with which the U.S. government can flag Foreign Bank Account Reports (FinCEN 114 formerly TDF 90-22.1) commonly known as “FBAR′s”. Furthermore, the IRS Criminal Investigation Division (“CID”) has created a group of special agents to monitor for just this occurrence.

The IRS has clearly indicated its disdain for those who make quiet disclosures instead of participating in OVDI and to discourage taxpayers from pursuing this route, the IRS has implemented procedures at the Service Centers to intercept those filings reporting foreign income for further review and investigation by the IRS.  Where a taxpayer has been discovered by IRS in this process, that taxpayer who made the quiet disclosure will not be eligible for the 27.5% OVDI penalty.  Instead the traditional penalties of 50% would apply.  Also, if appropriate, the IRS may recommend criminal prosecution to the Department of Justice. 

What Should You Do?

If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns or even if you have already quietly disclosed, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

Why Is It Better To Hire A Tax Attorney Instead Of Your Tax Preparer For Your OVDI Submission

A common question we hear a lot: My CPA who I have been going to for years has never told me that I had to report my foreign income. Now that I know I have to report my foreign income and disclose my foreign bank accounts, do I accept my CPA’s offer to represent me in OVDI or do I hire you?

CPA’s prepare tax returns and there are a lot of CPA’s and other tax professionals who a great in preparing tax returns.

A taxpayer will provide them with information and tax documents and a return will be generated for filing with the IRS. This process I refer to as “compliance”.

But a tax attorney will focus on “representation” – meaning that the cases taken on by the attorney are when the IRS is questioning a return or making other civil or even criminal inquiries of a taxpayer.

A tax attorney being familiar with the “representation” aspect, knows who to speak to at IRS and how to best present your case. A tax attorney can also devote full attention to your attention at any time since the tax attorney’s workload is not jammed like the CPA’s workload during tax season who is busy with tax return preparation and more focused over meeting filing deadlines and therefore cannot provide the needed attention to your case.

Speaking of civil and criminal inquiries, a taxpayer who engages a tax attorney also gets the benefit of attorney-client privilege. This benefit allows that taxpayer to freely discuss with his attorney any matters or issues without the threat of these communications being disclosed to the government or anyone else. You do not get this level of privilege when dealing with non-attorneys.

But I would have to say that the biggest factor is that with the tax attorney there is no conflict of interest. The best way to explain this is by example – if a great defense is that you relied on your tax preparer to tell you whether you had to report your foreign accounts and foreign income, do you think your tax preparer will put himself under the bus to save you from the IRS – chances are not. A tax attorney who had no involvement in the preparation of your returns can make these arguments thus truly serving your best interests.

If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

The Story Of Bradley Charles Birkenfeld And How Because Of His Actions No Longer Can Foreign Accounts Be A Secret.

If you have undisclosed foreign accounts you have an important decision to make. That decision being – when do you start disclosing your foreign bank accounts and foreign income and how should you disclose?

Many people thought that forever they can keep their foreign accounts a secret – not just from their creditors and spouses but also from the IRS.

Well thanks to a man called Bradley Charles Birkenfeld, no longer can these foreign accounts be a secret.

Birkenfeld, an American citizen who grew up in Boston and was educated at the American Graduate School of Business in Switzerland, was an up-and-coming banker rising through the ranks of Switzerland’s greatest bank, UBS. Working at UBS in Geneva, Switzerland, as a private banker offering wealth management services, his principal job responsibility over his 5-year tenure at UBS was to solicit wealthy Americans to move their assets to the bank, enabling them to hide their funds due to Switzerland’s strict banking secrecy laws and thus avoid paying U.S. taxes.

Birkenfeld was living the high life with UBS going to UBS sponsored events like art shows and yacht races in the United States to attract wealthy people as potential clients. The events gave its Switzerland-based bankers, who essentially behaved as salesmen offering the product of a Swiss tax haven, a chance to network with the rich in order to cement deals, which was illegal under U.S. banking laws.

One of Birkenfeld’s wealthiest clients was billionaire California real estate developer, Igor Olenicoff. Birkenfeld arranged for him to transfer $200 million to UBS and for Olenicoff to have these funds accessible via credit cards supplied to him by UBS. Birkenfeld then introduced Olenicoff to other bankers at UBS who helped him create off-shore companies to hid his assets and evade taxes.

Olenicoff subsequently pleaded guilty to tax evasion and paid a $52 million fine, but avoided a jail sentence. Apparently the U.S. Department Of Justice (DOJ) had their sites on a bigger target – that being Birkenfeld.

In 2005 Birkenfeld resigned from UBS. That is when he approached DOJ and informed the DOJ of UBS’ business practices.

At the same time, Birkenfeld wanted to take advantage of a new federal whistleblower law, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, that could pay him up to 30% of any tax revenue recouped by the IRS as a result of Birkenfeld’s information.

Birkenfeld also wanted immunity from prosecution for his part in UBS’s transactions.

Essentially Birkenfeld wanted to have his cake and eat it too!

When Birkenfeld saw that the DOJ was not meeting his demands, he contacted the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the IRS, and the U.S. Senate.

You would think with all of this information Birkenfeld would receive praise and gratitude by the Federal government. Instead, in May 2008, Birkenfeld was arrested in Boston when he deplaned from Switzerland. He was arraigned at the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida. The DOJ prosecutor in the case justified the prosecution of Birkenfeld by claiming he failed to be forthcoming about his clients, specifically, Igor Olenicoff. Eventually Birkenfeld agreed to plead guilty to a single count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Birkenfeld was sentenced by a U.S. District Judge to 40 months in prison and paying a $30,000 fine.

Since Birkenfeld blew the whistle on the UBS tax evasion scandal, in 2007 UBS avoided prosecution by agreeing to pay a fine of $780 million to the U.S. government.

Additionally, UBS paid $200 million for settlement with the SEC to avoid a trial on UBS’ alleged conduct that the company facilitated the ability of certain U.S. clients to maintain undisclosed accounts in Switzerland and other foreign countries, which enabled those clients to avoid paying taxes related to the assets in those accounts.

Finally to avoid additional fines, UBS agreed to provide the names of all Americans who had offshore accounts with UBS.

In the wake of the UBS scandal, the erosion of Switzerland’s fabled bank secrecy culminated when Switzerland officially signed on October 15, 2013 a treaty called the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. By Switzerland signing the treaty, they no longer could be a tax haven for offshore assets. The U.S. had won its war against Switzerland!

This then set the stage for the IRS’ worldwide campaign to break into foreign financial institutions and uncover U.S. accountholders.

So what ended up becoming of Birkenfeld? Birkenfeld was able to get his sentence commuted and ended up serving about 32 months. In September 2012, the IRS Whistleblower Office awarded Birkenfeld $104 million as a whistleblower. After serving a 32 month jail sentence – that equates to daily compensation of about $105,000.00.

If you have never reported your foreign investments on your U.S. Tax Returns, you should seriously consider participating in the IRS’s 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI). Once the IRS contacts you, you cannot get into this program and would be subject to the maximum penalties (civil and criminal) under the tax law. Taxpayers who hire an experienced tax attorney in Offshore Account Voluntary Disclosures should result in avoiding any pitfalls and gaining the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Protect yourself from excessive fines and possible jail time. Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. located in Los Angeles, San Francisco and elsewhere in California qualify you for OVDI.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

Opting-Out Of OVDI – Top Questions Answered

IRS has established programs for taxpayers to voluntarily come forward and disclose unreported foreign income and foreign accounts under what the IRS calls the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI).

On January 9, 2012 the IRS announced the terms of the 2012 OVDI which requires that taxpayers: (1) File 8 years of back tax returns reflecting unreported foreign source income; (2) Calculate interest each year on unpaid tax; (3) Apply a 20% accuracy-related penalty under Code Sec. 6662 or a 25% delinquency penalty under Code Sec. 6651; and (4) Apply up to a 27.5% penalty based upon the highest balance of the account in the past eight years.

In return for entering the offshore voluntary disclosure program, the IRS has agreed not to pursue charges of criminal tax evasion which would have resulted in jail time or a felony on your record; and other fraud and filing penalties including IRC Sec. 6663 fraud penalties (75% of the unpaid tax) and failure to file a TD F 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report, (FBAR) (the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the foreign account balance).

With taxpayers still facing a rather large penalty, taxpayers are torn on whether or not they should participate in OVDI or “Opt-Out”. The “opt-out” process was first introduced in the 2011 version of OVDI and still continues to this day.  As our office has received many inquiries on opting-out. Here are top OVDI opt-out questions that we are routinely asked.

1.         Will the IRS prosecute me criminally if I opt-out of the OVDI? The IRS should keep your case in Civil because you are still within the structure of voluntary disclosure (a program which the IRS encourages taxpayers to come forward in exchange for avoiding criminal prosecution) but you are no longer subject to the standard penalty rates of OVDI.  Under the standard 2012 OVDI penalty cap, you pay one penalty either (a) 12.5% of account value, Offshore “FBAR equivalent” penalty for accounts under $75,000, or (b) 27.5% for accounts over $75,000.So that standard 12.5% / 27.5% penalty cap is all that you are “opting-out” of.

2.         Will the IRS charge me more than the standard 12.5% or 27.5% offshore penalty if I opt out? That’s possible and therefore one of the risks to consider in opting-out.

3.         What is the status and outcome of those cases that have opted out?The opt-out program is fairly new as it was first introduced in 2011.  So far only a few have closed out and the IRS has not announced any guidelines as to how these cases are being dispensed.  The reason: The IRS is trying to centralize all opt-out decisions for consistency especially given the hazards of litigation that the IRS would face if one of these cases went to Court and the Court ruled in favor of the taxpayer.  Another reason for the delay is that the IRS overestimated how many intentional tax evaders would use the program, while simultaneously underestimating how many innocent or at worst negligent filers like ex pats, dual citizens, Visa holders and resident aliens, would be entering OVDI.

4.         What if I disagree. Can I appeal or dispute the agent’s determination?Yes. There are means to dispute an agent’s determination that will be different whether within OVDI or having opted out.  When disputing a determination that is within OVDI, we still remain on more certain ground as to the downside if we cannot effect any change.  However, outside OVDI the law lets the IRS “raise the bar” by assuming willfulness and thus charge multiple 50% penalties that can wipe out your entire net worth.

5.         For small cases, OVDI seems like overkill. Why don’t I just do a “soft” or “quiet” disclosure?The decision to enter into the program is entirely yours. And honestly, the biggest threat of not entering into the program is the risk of an FBAR audit – not criminal charges (although it is possible). But if caught in an FBAR audit, the results could be disastrous.A “soft” or “quiet” disclosure to us makes no sense. The IRS is using its vast data collecting tools and is receiving information directly from foreign financial institutions under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”).  Already IRS has discovered about 10,000 individuals and businesses that have made soft disclosures. The IRS claims they will track down all of those who have made soft or quiet disclosure.We have heard many people tell us they find the law unfair. Yet despite this unfairness, it is the law and our advice is to hire experienced tax counsel to take your case into OVDI and secure the best possible outcome within the OVDI guidelines.  We have found some “wiggle-room” in the guidelines that for some of our clients we used certain techniques that the IRS accepted resulting in lower penalties than what our clients thought they would be facing.

6.         If I made a soft disclosure can I still use the OVDI?Yes and you should. Again, the IRS has detected 10,000 people it suspects of making a soft disclosure. And these are only the accounts over $1 million. There are a lot more under $1 million.

7.         I started, or my CPA started my OVDI. But I am getting uncomfortable. I want to get a lawyer who specializes in this. Can you take over my case?We think that getting an OVDI / FBAR tax attorney is critical for your opt-out and from our experience each person’s case must be looked at separately to determine if opting-out is the best option.  If you have no evidence of willfulness, the sheer numbers may make opting out attractive especially where the proposed OVDI penalty is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.  But for those taxpayers whose proposed OVDI penalty is let’s say $80,000 or less, opting out probably can’t save you too much, especially if by opting out you end up with non-willful penalties which over a six-year period can equate to about the same amount as this $80,000 guideline amount referred herein.

From a broad perspective OVDI is predictable but opting out is much less so. As the above considerations reflect, think about your facts. Ask whether the potential risks and additional legal fees of opting out offset the potential rewards. Individual advice about the particular facts is important.

The tax attorneys at the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. are highly skilled in handling OVDI cases and can effectively represent you no matter what is the make-up or circumstances of your unreported foreign assets and unreported foreign income.  We will keep you informed step-by-step of the progress in your case and present your case in the best possible way to avoid any pitfalls and gain the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your foreign account filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.

What To Look For In Selecting A Tax Attorney For OVDI / FBAR

With the full enforcement of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”)starting July 1, 2014, all of the foreign banks have been requiring their U.S. account holders to disclose their social security numbers and other information so that the foreign bank may comply with this law and report their U.S. account holders to the IRS and avoidforced withholding on their U.S. investments.  That being the case, there has been an increase in inquiries to our office about going into the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”) and filing missed FBAR’s.

In 2009 our firm was one of the first firms to offer assistance to those taxpayers looking to come into compliance under the first OVDI program (that one was called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program or “OVDP”).  Since then a lot more companies have entered into the marketplacewith mass advertising on the internet offering their services to bring taxpayers into OVDI.  But with so many companies listed out there, who do you call?

Four Things You Should Consider In Making Your List Of Attorneys To Call:

  1. Only Deal With Tax Law Firms. Make sure the company is a tax law firm and not a CPA firm.  CPA firms typically do tax filings and other regular tax related stuff.OVDI applications involve legal issues which CPA firms cannot handle.  In addition, CPA’s do not have attorney-client privilege.  That is important because until you are accepted into OVDI, you could be subject to criminal prosecution or civil fraud.  So talk only to an attorney in a tax law firm for OVDI related stuff.
  2. Look At The Tax Law Firm’s Practice Area. Check out the firm’s website to determine the tax attorney’s major practice areas. Do they have information where they talk about FBAR, OVDI and other related stuff? Many of them have that in their blog or news area. That way you knew they have some idea and most likely experience in dealing with such cases.
  3. What Access To The Tax Attorney Is Being Offered. As most of the stuff can be done via email/phone/mail you do not need to be so focused on where the tax law firm is located. Instead be focused on getting access to speak with the tax attorney to get good feeling about your case.
  4. Does The Tax Attorney Offer A Free Initial Consultation? Most of the firms will have free initial phone consultation. Make use of it. If the receptionist answers your call tell you are looking for someone to consult about FBAR and OVDI.  A tax law firm who regularly does this kind of work will hook you up with the tax attorney you need to speak with for a confidential consultation.Some might be available right away but if they are really good at what they do youshould not be dissuaded if youhave to make an for the telephone conference.  Remember that the attorney is setting aside time so that he can exclusively devote full attention to your call. 

Some Things To Consider BEFORE You Make The Call.

Before you start making calls keep the following details handy:

  • Number of foreign financial accounts you have
  • When were they opened
  • The maximum balance at any point of time during each year and yearend balance in each accounts and the total balance of all account for each year. You can use the treasury department exchange rates to determine the $ equivalent.
  • If you haven’t reported the interest in those accounts in your tax returns then details of interest earned in those accounts for each year
  • Whether joint accounts or if anyone else has any authority to deposit or withdraw from those accounts.

What To Ask?

Here are few points

  • Discuss the situation. Let the attorney know that (a) you did not report interest in my foreign accounts and (b) you didn’t file FBAR for the years when the total of your foreign accounts exceeded $10,000. Once you tell that, the attorney should start asking more details and that’s when you will need information I suggested to collect in the above section.
  • The Process. Afterhearing your information, the attorney should suggest what he thinks is best in your case and tell you what the process would be like. If you are offered a free face-to-face consultation where you can see the attorney and let him review your documents(i.e., tax returns, bank statements, etc.), you should accept this offer.
  • Charges & Penalty.  Ask the attorney how bad is your situation. Ask how good the chances of you getting cleared from criminal charges are.  Ask what can be the maximum penalty and how good are chances of getting penalty waived or reduced. Ask what would be his strategy or reasoning to waive or reduce the penalty.
  • Time.  Ask the attorney how long will the entire process take.
  • Price. Ask the attorney what he would charge for the entire process. You should find that firms will either charge based on time spent and costs incurred or a set amount.  For those charging based on time spent and costs incurred, ask the attorney what would be the approximate time and costs. Firms who charge in this manner will usually have different levels of staff whose rates vary based on their level of skill or expertise so you should ask who else would be involved, their rates and impact to the total time charges.  For those firms who offer a set amount, ask what and all will they do and what you will have to do.  Some firms may even offer alternatives that if certain tasks are delegated to you or other third parties such as your accountant, the amount charged by the tax law firm can be less.

How Do You Know Which Tax Attorney Is Best For You?

The tax attorneys at the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. are highly skilled in handling OVDI cases and can effectively represent you no matter what is the make-up or circumstances of your unreported foreign assets and unreported foreign income.  We will keep you informed step-by-step of the progress in your case and present your case in the best possible way to avoid any pitfalls and gain the maximum benefits conferred by this program.

Description: Let the tax attorneys of the Law Offices Of Jeffrey B. Kahn, P.C. resolve your IRS tax problems, get you in compliance with your FBAR filing obligations, and minimize the chance of any criminal investigation or imposition of civil penalties.